Wednesday, May 26, 2010

UKM | Square pegs in round holes




Open letter to UKM vice-chancellor


WED, 26 MAY 2010 15:32
From U-Jean, UKM student,
via e-mail

Dear Dr Sharifah Hapsah,

I'm writing to you with regards to the persecution of the four UKM students who were hauled up for taking part in the Hulu Selangor by-election.

On June 2-3, they will be charged under Section 15(5) of the University and University Colleges Act 1971 which prohibits students from participating or expressing sympathy or support for any political parties.

I'm of the assumption that if we grant voting rights to citizens of 21 years and above, that would mean that we acknowledge their capacity to make decisions and to exercise their rights as lawful adults.

Therefore, as citizens of Malaysia, they have every right to participate in the political processes of the country. If so, why then are we persecuting them for exercising the right every adult Malaysian should have?

We already have too many students who are apathetic to the fate of the country. We complain about those who don't bother, don't care, and tak tahu and tak nak kisah about events that happens in the country.

These are among those who will eventually graduate to become graduates who are clueless about the social, political, and economic landscape and will fall among those without adequate soft skills.

When we finally have students who bother to take interest the election process, we choose to penalise them for their interest and for executing their rights.

Dear VC, when the rest of the student population cannot even be bothered about what’s happening in the country, shouldn’t we instead take pride in having students who do?

Are we to reward patriotism with penalties? On May 19, at 9.28am, you tweeted this on Twitter and also on Facebook, “Tun Musa Hitam: Youth & Women will change d world". But both need empowerment.

Now how do we empower youths to make decisions when their capacity to execute their basic rights as adults is limited and restricted? This isn't empowerment, this is control and intimidation not to mention an infringement of a person’s rights.

UKM's educational goal is "to produce graduates with strong leadership qualities who are confident of themselves with a strong sense of national integrity and are ethical and able to engage internationally."

Our four political science students stepped up to the plate to demonstrate that they can and will take interest in the nation's politics, confident, willing, and brave to engage with "the outside world".

Penalising these students would amount to contradicting UKM’s own educational goal. How can we refuse to acknowledge student leaders who rise above their peers, who have shown that their interest and contribution reaches beyond the walls of the university.

We choose to see them as pests and threats rather than recognise them as agents of change. We are not talking about ne’er-do-well hooliganistic troublemaker students, but among them are students with CGPAs of 3.79 and 3.51.

If we penalise them, we risk having generations of cowardly students, too afraid to challenge the status quo, and never break free from their comfort zone.

Is this the direction UKM is heading for?





What would the "Vice" Chancellor or Deputy Chancellor say? Are Law, Economics, Political Science Students not allowed to make meanings of their lives and that of their nation? They are more than informed compared our rural folks in the last Sibu By Election. So what message then would the Vice Chancellor have for the brainy citizens on Campus? What would the Chancellor's perception of the whole issue be? She should be more than capable any way, not least of all intellectually.

When she goes up to the rostrum to tell the students it is NOT RIGHT, the Government is RIGHT, wouldn't she be very intellectually dishonest?

Of course, it goes without saying that the decadent BN Government, who pays her salary (or is it us?) would be more at ease cheating and lying to less informed rural folks than matching brains for brains. When they get more confused, they intimidate citizens with guns and tear gas! And sometimes with bullets!

10 comments:

Jong said...

Yes, students today need to stand up for their rights, be given the rights to decide if they choose to participate or be involved in politics and not be pushed and bashed, again!

As concerned citizens, parents and family, we are obligated to give them our 100% support in their fight for justice and rights to decide which side of the political divide they choose to take.

If we claim we are a developing country then our brains/policies must be developed to accept what's best our young generation deserve, not repress and suppress to manipulate them!

Salak said...

Act 30, AUKU, Part 3 and 4 say the Minister will show his claws unless and until these are repealed and abolished.

If they won't it lends further indignation and anger on BN's decadence which further will stall any good thing that's possible in the ecoomic as well as political processes.

Sadly, androids cannot yet make themselves! Maybe the Education Minister is an Android Class AUKI-X1 !

Possible!

Anonymous said...

For goodness sake, these 4 students DID NO WRONG. They are political science students, therefore, they are keen to observe first hand of the electorial process. The Idiot VC should be impartial and not impose unreasonable rules. Give these guys a break, I am sure his conscience will let him sleep better at nights too.

Salak said...

Err... Itu Dr Dr Sharifah Hapsah perempuan lah!

Jong said...

If the VC takes care of her "conscience", she'll be out of job tomorrow. It's ok if the students say, go on UMNO-sponsored field trips but joining opposition camp can be a suicidal affair! This was what happened in Hulu Selangor.

Salak said...

Actually, peaceful protests by UKM students might make the UKM management seek a resolution for a greening of our universities, open talks and start dialogs. Could even see a resurgence in youthful passion for constructive social changes. These are adult citizens capable twice of most of the decadent UMNO leaders. The average U-students have always been given solutions, never finding them out for and by themselves.

Salak said...

OOooops!

It is ACT 30 Section 15 (1) - (5) that put the clamp down on students to associate, support or express opinions with any organizations other than those approved by the University or the Higher Education Minister.

The AUKU ACT is H E R E !

Jarod said...

Impossible for AUKU to go away! Unless all UNI STUDENTS come upfront and voice out! That also include us!

Salak said...

I don't know, Jarod.

Maybe ISA and AUKU have really stopped many people from thinking as RPK says in the short clip.

Do you think they have?

Salak said...

["...

Wei Yu Lun Cheng says:

韋于倫成 has left a new comment on your post "UKM | Square pegs in round holes":

舊書不厭百回讀,熟讀深思子自知。


Google says:
Wei Yu Lun Cheng has left a new comment on your post "UKM | Square pegs in round holes":

100 back tire of reading books, children knew that familiar food for thought.
..."]